<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757</id><updated>2012-02-16T23:29:25.972-05:00</updated><category term='IT Security'/><category term='copyright'/><category term='cell phones'/><category term='internet security'/><category term='bot nets'/><category term='spam'/><category term='internet'/><category term='Records Retention'/><category term='website liability'/><category term='defamation'/><category term='net neutrality'/><category term='cybersquatting'/><category term='privacy'/><category term='electronic discovery'/><category term='trade secrets'/><category term='general'/><category term='metadata'/><category term='identity theft'/><category term='Spyware'/><category term='IT Security; wireless'/><category term='VOIP'/><category term='outsourcing'/><title type='text'>Technology Law Blog</title><subtitle type='html'>A discussion of current developments in technology law</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>99</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-4197934972979064966</id><published>2008-10-24T15:54:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-10-24T16:00:06.797-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>New Report On Identity Theft</title><content type='html'>US AG, Michael B. Mukasey, and FTC Chairman William Kovacic recently announced the publication of &lt;a href="http://www.idtheft.gov/reports/IDTReport2008.pdf"&gt;a new report&lt;/a&gt; on identity theft. In April of '07, the President's Identity Theft Task Force published a &lt;a href="http://www.idtheft.gov/reports/StrategicPlan.pdf"&gt;strategic plan&lt;/a&gt;, listing 31 recommendations, for combating identity theft. This new report details the steps the government has taken to accomplish the recommendations set out in the original report.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-4197934972979064966?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/4197934972979064966/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=4197934972979064966' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4197934972979064966'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4197934972979064966'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/new-report-on-identity-theft.html' title='New Report On Identity Theft'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-131278311211628257</id><published>2008-10-03T15:26:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-10-03T15:33:09.747-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='net neutrality'/><title type='text'>Net Neutrality As An Anitrust Issue</title><content type='html'>I recently came across &lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bac78ca4-8ee8-11dd-946c-0000779fd18c.html?nclick_check=1"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; discussing the &lt;a href="http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/ftcs-ruling-on-net-neutrality.html"&gt;FCC's Comcast ruling&lt;/a&gt;. The article, which references &lt;a href="http://www.reg-markets.org/publications/abstract.php?pid=1171"&gt;a journal article&lt;/a&gt; written by Cornell professor Alfred Kahn, suggests that the issue of net neutrality should best be dealt with by the antitrust courts.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-131278311211628257?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/131278311211628257/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=131278311211628257' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/131278311211628257'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/131278311211628257'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/10/net-neutrality-as-anitrust-issue.html' title='Net Neutrality As An Anitrust Issue'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6763746812394171042</id><published>2008-09-19T16:00:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-10-03T15:02:08.883-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spam'/><title type='text'>VA Spam Law Overturned</title><content type='html'>The Virginia Supreme Court &lt;a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/09/virginia_anti-spam_law_overtur.html?hpid=news-col-blogs"&gt;recently ruled&lt;/a&gt; that the state's anti-spam law is unconstitutional. The &lt;a href="http://www.spamsuite.com/node/423"&gt;Court&lt;/a&gt; wrote that: "the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad on its face because it prohibits the anonymous transmission of all unsolicited bulk e-mails including those containing political, religious or other speech protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution." See this &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/12/AR2008091201211.html?hpid=topnews"&gt;Washington Post article&lt;/a&gt; for more.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6763746812394171042?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6763746812394171042/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6763746812394171042' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6763746812394171042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6763746812394171042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/va-spam-law-overturned.html' title='VA Spam Law Overturned'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1112352771720647110</id><published>2008-09-12T15:42:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-09-12T15:48:30.209-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><title type='text'>Compliance With The Red Flag Rules</title><content type='html'>This &lt;a href="http://washington.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2008/09/08/daily26.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; reports that less than-third of US banks will be compliant with the &lt;a href="http://www.fdic.gov/news/board/07Oct16nine.pdf"&gt;Red Flag rules&lt;/a&gt; by the November 1 deadline. All told, U.S. financial institutions are expected to spend more than $200 million on compliance with the rules. For more on the Red Flag rules, see &lt;a href="http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/search?q=red+flag"&gt;these posts&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1112352771720647110?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1112352771720647110/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1112352771720647110' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1112352771720647110'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1112352771720647110'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/compliance-with-red-flag-rules.html' title='Compliance With The Red Flag Rules'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-3577440839263427066</id><published>2008-09-05T16:18:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-09-05T16:21:50.084-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='net neutrality'/><title type='text'>Comcast Appeals FCC Decision</title><content type='html'>Following on a &lt;a href="http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/ftcs-ruling-on-net-neutrality.html"&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt;, Comcast yesterday &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122055137368500197.html?mod=googlenews_wsj"&gt;appealed&lt;/a&gt; the FCC ruling that it violated the Agency's net-neutrality principles. Take a look at the &lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/comcastappeals.pdf"&gt;petition for review&lt;/a&gt; filed with the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-3577440839263427066?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/3577440839263427066/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=3577440839263427066' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3577440839263427066'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3577440839263427066'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/comcast-appeals-fcc-decision.html' title='Comcast Appeals FCC Decision'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-783996065713220220</id><published>2008-08-26T16:58:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-26T17:07:25.668-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='outsourcing'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>ABA Issues Outsourcing Ethics Opinion</title><content type='html'>Just &lt;a href="http://www.abanet.org/abanet/media/release/news_release.cfm?releaseid=435"&gt;yesteday&lt;/a&gt;, the ABA issued Ethics Opinion opinion 08-451 (not available online) dealing with the outsourcing of legal services. In brief, the Opinion permits outsourcing assuming both the attorney and the outsourcees adhere to certain standards of ethics and competence. See this &lt;a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/aba_ethics_group_oks_outsourcing_but_nixes_at_least_some_fee_mark_ups/#When:19:12:01Z"&gt;ABA Journal article&lt;/a&gt; as well as this &lt;a href="http://www.mddailyrecord.com/article.cfm?id=8393&amp;amp;type=UTTM"&gt;Daily Record article&lt;/a&gt; (subscription) for more.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-783996065713220220?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/783996065713220220/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=783996065713220220' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/783996065713220220'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/783996065713220220'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/aba-issues-outsourcing-ethics-opinion.html' title='ABA Issues Outsourcing Ethics Opinion'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-4865299661205534838</id><published>2008-08-22T14:52:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-22T15:28:38.826-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='net neutrality'/><title type='text'>FCC's Ruling On Net Neutrality</title><content type='html'>Following on &lt;a href="http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/fcc-rules-on-net-neutrality.html"&gt;my post&lt;/a&gt; from a little while back, the FCC finally published their &lt;a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-183A1.pdf"&gt;Order&lt;/a&gt; regarding Comcast's violation of the Agency's net neutrality principles. The Order &lt;a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/2008/08/18/daily33.html?ana=e_du"&gt;gives Comcast&lt;/a&gt; 30 days to disclose their method for managing internet traffic.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-4865299661205534838?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/4865299661205534838/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=4865299661205534838' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4865299661205534838'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4865299661205534838'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/ftcs-ruling-on-net-neutrality.html' title='FCC&apos;s Ruling On Net Neutrality'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1601510252234280437</id><published>2008-08-11T16:29:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-12T14:36:09.206-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>ID Theft Ring Uncovered</title><content type='html'>Prosecutors &lt;a href="http://www.ktnv.com/Global/story.asp?S=8799776"&gt;announced&lt;/a&gt; that they have uncovered the identities of the thieves behind the T.J. Max, Barnes &amp;amp; Noble, and The Sports Authority identity theft cases. The case, which involves 11 people, is being dubbed the largest identity theft case ever prosecuted. The thieves reportedly stole 40 million confidential records. &lt;a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/149485/massive_identity_theft_exposes_troubling_trend.html"&gt;Investigators say&lt;/a&gt; the suspects obtained their information largely through hacking into wireless networks. See &lt;a href="http://news.technology.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/cyberlaw/080508indictment.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for a copy of the indictment.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1601510252234280437?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1601510252234280437/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1601510252234280437' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1601510252234280437'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1601510252234280437'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/id-theft-ring-uncovered.html' title='ID Theft Ring Uncovered'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-21404797144245499</id><published>2008-08-05T15:01:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-05T15:17:07.643-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='copyright'/><title type='text'>New Copyright Suit Against YouTube</title><content type='html'>YouTube now faces a &lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200807301025DOWJONESDJONLINE000654_FORTUNE5.htm"&gt;new copyright suit&lt;/a&gt;. Italian media company Mediaset has sued YouTube, alleging the video-sharing website unlawfully made use of thousands of copyrighted video clips. This latest suit comes after a similar suit by Viacom for $1 billion.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-21404797144245499?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/21404797144245499/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=21404797144245499' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/21404797144245499'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/21404797144245499'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/new-copyright-suit-against-youtube.html' title='New Copyright Suit Against YouTube'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-2281394717361436993</id><published>2008-08-01T14:12:00.006-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-01T15:50:11.511-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='net neutrality'/><title type='text'>FCC Rules On Net Neutrality</title><content type='html'>The FCC &lt;a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284286A1.pdf"&gt;issued&lt;/a&gt; its much anticipated ruling today on &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121760649709704897.html?mod=googlenews_wsj"&gt;net-neutrality&lt;/a&gt;, alleging that Comcast interfered with the free nature of the web when it wrongly slowed some of its customers' Internet traffic. Consumer groups had initially &lt;a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/pdf/fp_pk_comcast_complaint.pdf"&gt;sued&lt;/a&gt; Comcast but then later &lt;a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/pdf/fp_et_al_nn_declaratory_ruling.pdf"&gt;asked the FCC&lt;/a&gt; for a declaratory ruling on the matter. The FCC's opinion effectively changes the playing field by making the US government a regulator of the internet. The FCC's Memorandum Opinion and Order (FCC 08-183) is not yet available online.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-2281394717361436993?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2281394717361436993/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=2281394717361436993' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2281394717361436993'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2281394717361436993'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/fcc-rules-on-net-neutrality.html' title='FCC Rules On Net Neutrality'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-651755107827904180</id><published>2008-07-29T17:08:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-29T17:11:58.129-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>Identity Theft Monitoring Services</title><content type='html'>Many companies offer these services as additional protection for identity theft. Are they worth purchasing? Are they effective? Privacy Rights Clearinghouse recently published &lt;a href="http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs33-CreditMonitoring.htm"&gt;this new guide&lt;/a&gt;: "Straight Talk about Identity Theft Monitoring Services."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-651755107827904180?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/651755107827904180/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=651755107827904180' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/651755107827904180'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/651755107827904180'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/identity-theft-monitoring-services.html' title='Identity Theft Monitoring Services'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-7346270262013268566</id><published>2008-07-24T16:49:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-24T17:03:27.842-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spam'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='cell phones'/><title type='text'>Unsolicited Text Message Suit Given Go Ahead</title><content type='html'>TMobile's &lt;a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/telecom/hagens-berman-t-mobile-loses-important-battle-cell-phone-text-messaging-case/"&gt;attempt to dismiss&lt;/a&gt; a class action suit filed by disgruntled TMobile users has been dismissed. The suit, &lt;a href="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/zald_class_action_defense_ord.pdf"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Zaldivar v. T-Mobile USA&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, alleges that TMobile forces cell phone users to pay for unsolicited text messages. Filed on July 15 in the Federal District Court for the Western District of Washington state, the suit &lt;a href="http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/2008/07/tmobile_class_action_defense_c.html"&gt;alleges&lt;/a&gt; breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violations of &lt;a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?Cite=19.86&amp;amp;full=true"&gt;Washington’s Consumer Protection Act&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-7346270262013268566?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7346270262013268566/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=7346270262013268566' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7346270262013268566'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7346270262013268566'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/suit-for-unsolicited-text-messages.html' title='Unsolicited Text Message Suit Given Go Ahead'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-2185029401744651689</id><published>2008-07-15T16:20:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-15T16:29:23.514-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='net neutrality'/><title type='text'>Net Neutrality Suit On Hold</title><content type='html'>Jon Hart's suit against Comcast has been &lt;a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/14/comcast-buys-time-in-case-on-neutrality/"&gt;put on hold&lt;/a&gt;. Hart, a Comcast subscriber had sued Comcast alleging that the company is violating &lt;a href="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-151A1.doc"&gt;FCC net neutrality principles&lt;/a&gt; by interfering with certain types of internet traffic. The case has been put on hold until an FCC investigation into the matter has been concluded. The &lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/hart_v_comcast.pdf"&gt;suit&lt;/a&gt;, originally filed in California Superior Court, has since been removed to federal court.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-2185029401744651689?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2185029401744651689/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=2185029401744651689' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2185029401744651689'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2185029401744651689'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/net-neutrality-suit-on-hold.html' title='Net Neutrality Suit On Hold'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1418252097979947133</id><published>2008-07-09T17:14:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-15T16:32:04.374-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><title type='text'>Deadline For Red Flag Rules Approaching</title><content type='html'>With the so-called &lt;a href="http://www.fdic.gov/news/board/07Oct16nine.pdf"&gt;Red Flag rules&lt;/a&gt; set to become effective on Nov. 1, the FTC is beginning a campaign to help educate the public on the details of the new regs. The FTC recently published an &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/business/alerts/alt050.shtm"&gt;Alert&lt;/a&gt; to help companies better understand the law. The Red Flag rules require certain types of companies to implement identity theft prevention programs. See this &lt;a href="http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/most-recent-national-law-journal.html"&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt; for more info.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1418252097979947133?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1418252097979947133/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1418252097979947133' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1418252097979947133'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1418252097979947133'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/red-flag-rule-deadline-approaching.html' title='Deadline For Red Flag Rules Approaching'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-9170736799578575719</id><published>2008-07-08T14:41:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-08T14:53:20.925-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spam'/><title type='text'>McAfee's Spam Experiment</title><content type='html'>In an effort to better understand spam, McAfee recently &lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/security/print.php/3756586"&gt;commissioned 50 people&lt;/a&gt; to surf the net without any anti-spam/spyware protection for a period of a month. At the end of a month, the 50 participants had received 104,000 unsolicited messages, totalling around 70 messages a day for each participant. One of the findings was the amount emanating from outside the US. Of the 104,000 letters, only 23,233 were in English. During the month-long experiment, McAfee encouraged the participants to log their experiences in a blog. Check out the blog &lt;a href="http://www.mcafeespamexperiment.com/us/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-9170736799578575719?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/9170736799578575719/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=9170736799578575719' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/9170736799578575719'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/9170736799578575719'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/mcafees-spam-experiment.html' title='McAfee&apos;s Spam Experiment'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-4164289409968738462</id><published>2008-07-08T10:35:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-08T11:26:03.902-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spam'/><title type='text'>New Spam Rules Go Into Effect</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-11394.pdf"&gt;New CAN-SPAM rules&lt;/a&gt;, published in May, went into effect yesterday. Among other things, the new rules clarify who is obligated to comply with CAN-SPAM, clarify the definition of “sender,” and include new unsubscribe requirements. See &lt;a href="http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080707/BUSINESS/80707005/1003/BUSINESS"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; for more info. For help complying with CAN-SPAM, including the new rules, see this &lt;a href="http://email.exacttarget.com/uploadedFiles/Resources/Whitepapers/CAN-SPAM%20Compliance%20for%20Email%20Marketing.pdf"&gt;White Paper&lt;/a&gt; from ExactTarget (free registration required).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-4164289409968738462?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/4164289409968738462/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=4164289409968738462' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4164289409968738462'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4164289409968738462'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/new-spam-rules-go-into-effect.html' title='New Spam Rules Go Into Effect'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-8659996529706662842</id><published>2008-07-03T09:53:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-03T09:59:21.109-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>2008 Security Breach Report</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href="http://www.idtheftcenter.org/"&gt;Identity Theft Resource Center&lt;/a&gt; recently published their &lt;a href="http://idtheftmostwanted.org/ITRC%20Breach%20Report%202008.pdf"&gt;2008 security breach incidence report&lt;/a&gt;. For each incident the report provides the number the exposed records, the breach type (print or electronic), and a link to a news article about the incident. So far in '08, the report counts 346 security breach incidents totalling upwards of 16 million exposed records.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-8659996529706662842?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8659996529706662842/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=8659996529706662842' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8659996529706662842'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8659996529706662842'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/2008-security-breach-report.html' title='2008 Security Breach Report'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-486643121305813717</id><published>2008-07-03T09:43:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-03T09:49:23.603-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>California Expands Identity Theft Law</title><content type='html'>California Governor Arnold Schwartzenegger &lt;a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/privacy/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208802209"&gt;recently&lt;/a&gt; signed into law &lt;a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0601-0650/sb_612_bill_20080701_chaptered.pdf"&gt;SB 612&lt;/a&gt; which makes it easier to prosecute identity theft crimes in California. Under the old system, prosecutions could only take place where the crime occurred, which is usually in the perpetrators' towns or cities. With the passage of this bill, prosecutors can now charge people with identity theft in the jurisdictions where the &lt;em&gt;victims&lt;/em&gt; live. This is significant because prosecutors are generally more aggressive when they're fighting criminals in their home town.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-486643121305813717?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/486643121305813717/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=486643121305813717' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/486643121305813717'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/486643121305813717'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/california-expands-identity-theft-law.html' title='California Expands Identity Theft Law'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6177551818730171675</id><published>2008-06-30T17:06:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-30T17:16:53.905-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spam'/><title type='text'>New Guidelines To Deal With SPAM</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1454647/new_guidelines_introduced_to_reduce_email_spam/"&gt;This article&lt;/a&gt; discusses new guidelines released by &lt;a href="http://www.maawg.org/"&gt;The Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group&lt;/a&gt; (MAAWG) intended to reduce spam. According to the article, the new guidelines (which do not appear to be available online) recommend that ISPs use separate servers for received and forwarded e-mails, and that they block port 25, through which spam travels. Even if the guidelines were successfully adopted, though, there's no indication that they would be successful. Still, this might be a start.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6177551818730171675?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6177551818730171675/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6177551818730171675' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6177551818730171675'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6177551818730171675'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/new-guidelines-to-deal-with-spam.html' title='New Guidelines To Deal With SPAM'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6552945714557346754</id><published>2008-06-24T15:32:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-24T15:44:16.972-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>Texas AG Settles With EZCORP Over Identity Theft</title><content type='html'>The Texas Attorney General's Office &lt;a href="http://www.legalnewsline.com/news/213715-abbott-reaches-600000-settlement-with-ezcorp-over-its-document-handling"&gt;announced a settlement yesterday&lt;/a&gt; with EZCORP over the company's failure to adequately safeguard customer's personal information. Apparently, the company had simply dumped 483 customer records laden with social security numbers and other highly sensitive information in the trash. The AG's office &lt;a href="http://www.oag.state.tx.us/newspubs/releases/2007/050307ezpawn_pop.pdf"&gt;filed suit&lt;/a&gt; under &lt;a href="http://tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/BC/content/htm/bc.004.00.000048.00.htm#48.102.00"&gt;Texas Business &amp;amp; Comm. Code Section 48-102&lt;/a&gt;, claiming the company had failed to implement "reasonable procedures" to safeguard customers personal information. The AG's website includes a &lt;a href="http://www.oag.state.tx.us/newspubs/releases/2007/050307ezpawn.pdf"&gt;picture&lt;/a&gt; of a credit application that was found in the trash.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6552945714557346754?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6552945714557346754/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6552945714557346754' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6552945714557346754'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6552945714557346754'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/texas-ag-settles-with-ezcorp-over.html' title='Texas AG Settles With EZCORP Over Identity Theft'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-5659986830157830697</id><published>2008-06-16T17:39:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-16T17:50:15.475-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='website liability'/><title type='text'>Web Site Liability For Third Party Content</title><content type='html'>The question of when a website owner becomes liable for content posted by third parties has been around for some time. As far back as 1997, the Courts were already dealing with this issue (See &lt;a href="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/971523.P.pdf"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Zeran v. AOL&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;). In the past several months a number of new opinions on this issue have appeared. In May of this year, the 9th Circuit case &lt;a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/F71559D8162BA7EE8825741F00771BC1/$file/0456916.pdf?openelement"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fair Housing Council v. Roommates.com&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; tackled the issue of whether an online roommate matching website should be held liable for violation of the federal housing discrimination laws, since certain postings discriminated against particular groups. The Court held that the website could be held liable because it used drop-down menus to limit users' choice as to the content of their listing. As a result, the safeharbor provisions of the &lt;a href="http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode47/usc_sec_47_00000230----000-.html"&gt;Communications Deceny Act&lt;/a&gt; (CDA) did not apply. On the other hand, in March of this year, the 7th Circuit in &lt;a href="http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/fdocs/docs.fwx?submit=rss_sho&amp;amp;shofile=07-1101_021.pdf"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Chicago Lawyer's Committee v. Craigslist&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; found Craigslist immune under the CDA for user posted listings which likewise discriminated against certain groups. The distinction between the two rulings appears to be that once a website operator takes an active involvement in the generation of content (as was the case in the Fair Housing decision), the safeharbor provisions of the CDA no longer apply.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-5659986830157830697?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5659986830157830697/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=5659986830157830697' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5659986830157830697'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5659986830157830697'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/web-site-liability-for-third-party.html' title='Web Site Liability For Third Party Content'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-8277890507731300384</id><published>2008-06-16T12:50:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-16T13:01:16.529-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>Suing For Identity Theft Using RICO</title><content type='html'>Check out this National Law Journal article, "&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202421973773"&gt;RICO And Data Thieves&lt;/a&gt;" (subscription). Historically, data theft has been largely prosecuted using the &lt;a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001030----000-.html"&gt;Computer Fraud and Abuse Act&lt;/a&gt; (CFAA). The author, &lt;a href="http://www.dorsey.com/akerman_nick/"&gt;Nick Akerman&lt;/a&gt;, suggests that filing suit under the &lt;a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001961----000-.html"&gt;Racketeer Influenced and Currupt Organizations&lt;/a&gt; (RICO) statute might have some advantages. As the author points out, RICO, unlike the CFAA, provides for treble damages and attorney fees.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-8277890507731300384?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8277890507731300384/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=8277890507731300384' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8277890507731300384'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8277890507731300384'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/rico-as-identity-theft-prosecution.html' title='Suing For Identity Theft Using RICO'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6343756730386178290</id><published>2008-06-13T16:26:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-16T13:03:34.385-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='metadata'/><title type='text'>The Ethics of Viewing Metadata</title><content type='html'>The controversy over whether an attorney is permitted to view the metadata of documents they receive from opposing counsel has been ongoing for some time. A number of jurisdictions--including &lt;a href="http://www.floridabar.org/tfb/tfbetopin.nsf/SearchView/ETHICS,+OPINION+06-2?opendocument"&gt;Florida&lt;/a&gt; (Ethics Opinion 06-2) and &lt;a href="http://www.nysba.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Ethics_Opinions&amp;amp;CONTENTID=6533&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm"&gt;New York&lt;/a&gt; (Ethics Opinion 749)--prohibit an attorney from making use of the metadata. The &lt;a href="http://www.pdfforlawyers.com/files/06_442.pdf"&gt;ABA&lt;/a&gt; (Ethics Opinion 06-442), on the other hand, permits it. Boris Reznikov recently published this &lt;a href="http://www.lctjournal.washington.edu/Vol4/a13Reznikov.html"&gt;excellent article&lt;/a&gt; on the current state of the legal ethics debate on metadata.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6343756730386178290?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6343756730386178290/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6343756730386178290' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6343756730386178290'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6343756730386178290'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/ethical-problems-with-viewing-metadata.html' title='The Ethics of Viewing Metadata'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-3547663451796534397</id><published>2008-06-13T16:10:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-13T16:20:39.302-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>Do Data Breach Laws Reduce Identity Theft?</title><content type='html'>A new working paper entitled "&lt;a href="http://weis2008.econinfosec.org/papers/Romanosky.pdf"&gt;Do Data Breach Laws Reduce Identity Theft&lt;/a&gt;?" (Carnegie Mellon University) analyzes the effect of data breach laws on the presence of identity theft. Although the authors acknowlege limitations to their study, they conclude that they found no statistically significant effect that data breach laws reduce identity theft. This is one more indication that an effective approach to tackling the problem of identity theft requires more than enacting legislation alone.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-3547663451796534397?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/3547663451796534397/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=3547663451796534397' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3547663451796534397'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3547663451796534397'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/do-data-breach-laws-reduce-identity.html' title='Do Data Breach Laws Reduce Identity Theft?'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-9109854982558104922</id><published>2008-06-06T14:14:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-06T15:02:08.622-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='general'/><title type='text'>New York Internet Sales Tax Setting A Trend?</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.ecommerce-guide.com/news/news/article.php/3751351"&gt;A highly controversial New York law&lt;/a&gt; recently went into effect. Under the new law (Chapter 57, Laws 2008, Part KK-1), New York becomes the first state to require internet sales companies to collect sales tax. Will this new law set a trend for other states? According to this &lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202421990811"&gt;National Law Journal article&lt;/a&gt; (subscription), legislators in Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Kansas and Minnesota are also considering passing similar laws. For a fuller explanation of the law, see this &lt;a href="http://www.tax.state.ny.us/pdf/memos/sales/m08_3s.pdf"&gt;technical bulletin&lt;/a&gt;. A number of retailers--Amazon.com and Overstock.com--have already filed suit. See Overstock's &lt;a href="http://www.netchoice.org/library/overstock-summons-complaint.pdf"&gt;Complaint&lt;/a&gt; here.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-9109854982558104922?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/9109854982558104922/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=9109854982558104922' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/9109854982558104922'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/9109854982558104922'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/new-york-internet-sales-tax-setting.html' title='New York Internet Sales Tax Setting A Trend?'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-5643194566439342333</id><published>2008-06-03T15:27:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-03T15:47:28.433-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><title type='text'>Vulnerabilities of Printers and Copiers</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://news.technology.findlaw.com/ap/high_tech/1700//06-03-2008/20080603090505_16.html"&gt;This AP article&lt;/a&gt;, quoting the &lt;a href="http://www.enisa.europa.eu/"&gt;European Network and Information Security Agency&lt;/a&gt;, warns that printers and copiers could be the weak link in a company's cyber defense program. For more on this, see &lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/08/printer_securit.html"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; by Bruce Schneier responding to &lt;a href="http://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-usa-06/BH-US-06-OConnor.pdf"&gt;a presentation&lt;/a&gt; by Brendan O'Connor.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-5643194566439342333?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5643194566439342333/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=5643194566439342333' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5643194566439342333'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5643194566439342333'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/vulnerabilities-of-printers-and-copiers.html' title='Vulnerabilities of Printers and Copiers'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1497438479388770915</id><published>2008-05-27T17:59:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-27T18:00:02.243-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='general'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>Law Firm Suit For The Outsourcing of Litigation Support</title><content type='html'>The Annapolis, MD law firm of Newman McIntosh &amp;amp; Hennessey recently &lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202421668147"&gt;filed suit&lt;/a&gt; against a legal process outsourcer located in India. The &lt;a href="http://nmhlaw.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/AmendedComplaint.13481249.pdf"&gt;case&lt;/a&gt;, filed in US District Court for DC, seeks a ruling from the court on the following question: “Given the pervasive nature of the signals intercept by the United StatesGovernment and UKUSA Allies, will the electronic transmission of data to foreign nationals residing overseas waive Fourth Amendment protections with respect to the data transmitted?” It appears that the law firm also submitted this question to the Ethics Committee of the DC Bar. See &lt;a href="http://nmhlaw.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/DCLegalEthicsCmteReqwExhibits.136152609.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for more info.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1497438479388770915?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1497438479388770915/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1497438479388770915' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1497438479388770915'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1497438479388770915'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/law-firm-suit-for-outsourcing-of.html' title='Law Firm Suit For The Outsourcing of Litigation Support'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-3760713734610972353</id><published>2008-05-21T17:25:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-03T15:49:55.429-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>Maryland Identity Theft Statute Held Not To Apply To Fictitious Identities</title><content type='html'>Maryland's highest court recently published a surprising &lt;a href="http://mdcourts.gov/opinions/coa/2008/66a07.pdf"&gt;ruling&lt;/a&gt;: to be prosecuted under the Maryland identity theft statute (&lt;a href="http://michie.lexisnexis.com/maryland/lpext.dll?f=templates&amp;amp;fn=main-h.htm&amp;amp;cp"&gt;Criminal Law Article 8-301&lt;/a&gt;), one must have stolen the identity of an actual person. The statute does not apply, the court reasoned, in cases where an individual commits identity theft using a fictitious identity. The majority of the case centers on an analysis of the term "another" in the statute. After delving into the statute's legislative history, the court determined that "another" must refer to an actual person for the statute to apply.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-3760713734610972353?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/3760713734610972353/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=3760713734610972353' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3760713734610972353'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3760713734610972353'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/maryland-identity-theft-statute-held.html' title='Maryland Identity Theft Statute Held Not To Apply To Fictitious Identities'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-7740566205061478572</id><published>2008-05-21T17:15:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-21T17:22:30.737-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spam'/><title type='text'>New CAN-SPAM Rules</title><content type='html'>The FTC recently (May 12) recently published &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/2008/05/R411008frn.pdf"&gt;a new final rule&lt;/a&gt; implementing the &lt;a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sec_15_00007701----000-.html"&gt;CAN-SPAM Act&lt;/a&gt; (15 U.S.C. 7701-7713). For a brief overview of the new rules, &lt;a href="http://www.digestiblelaw.com/spam/blogQ.aspx?entry=5057"&gt;see here&lt;/a&gt;. For the Press Release announcing the new rules, &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2008/05/canspam.shtm"&gt;see here&lt;/a&gt;. For a more detailed overview of the rules, see &lt;a href="http://www.btobonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080515/FREE/101312375/1116/FREE"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; from B2B.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-7740566205061478572?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7740566205061478572/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=7740566205061478572' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7740566205061478572'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7740566205061478572'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/new-can-spam-rules.html' title='New CAN-SPAM Rules'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-8517086106824382814</id><published>2008-05-12T12:27:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-21T17:23:45.811-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='net neutrality'/><title type='text'>New Net Neutrality Bill</title><content type='html'>Representative &lt;a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00004029&amp;amp;cycle=Career"&gt;John Conyers&lt;/a&gt; (D-Mich) recently introduced (May 8th) &lt;a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6559178.html"&gt;a new bill&lt;/a&gt; (HR 5994) on net neutrality dubbed the ‘‘&lt;a href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&amp;amp;docid=f:h5994ih.txt.pdf"&gt;Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008&lt;/a&gt;." This is the the most recent of a series of bills on this issue. Other notable bills dealing with net neutrality include &lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc110/h5353_ih.xml"&gt;HR 5353&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&amp;amp;docid=f:s215is.txt.pdf"&gt;S 215&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc109/h5417_rh.xml"&gt;HR 5417&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=109_cong_bills&amp;amp;docid=f:s2917is.txt.pdf"&gt;S.2917&lt;/a&gt;. For a list of net neutrality bills which have been introduced, see this &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality_in_the_United_States"&gt;Wikipedia article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-8517086106824382814?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8517086106824382814/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=8517086106824382814' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8517086106824382814'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8517086106824382814'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/new-net-neutrality-bill.html' title='New Net Neutrality Bill'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-3901979768191489555</id><published>2008-05-12T11:34:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-12T11:43:23.720-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='electronic discovery'/><title type='text'>EDiscovery Vendor Suits</title><content type='html'>For those of you that missed the news a few months back, the law firm of Sullivan &amp;amp; Cromwell &lt;a href="http://infogovernance.blogspot.com/2008/01/eed-and-sullivan-cromwell-llp-agree-to.html"&gt;agreed to settle&lt;/a&gt; with ediscovery vendor Electronic Data Discovery. &lt;a href="http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-nysdce/case_no-1:2007cv11616/case_id-318631/"&gt;Sullivan &amp;amp; Cromwell&lt;/a&gt; had sued the vendor for alledly providing sub-par work. See &lt;a href="http://www.catalystsecure.com/articles/TechLaw360_1-15-08.pdf"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; for more info. The case is important because it could be the first of many similar suits.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-3901979768191489555?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/3901979768191489555/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=3901979768191489555' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3901979768191489555'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3901979768191489555'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/ediscovery-vendor-suits.html' title='EDiscovery Vendor Suits'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6866334915313215870</id><published>2008-05-02T15:18:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-02T15:26:35.760-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Records Retention'/><title type='text'>Rambus Wins On Appeal</title><content type='html'>As this &lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1209459939141&amp;amp;rss=newswire"&gt;Law.com&lt;/a&gt; article reports, the ongoing litigation between Samsung and Rambus seems to have come to a close. The Rambus case had caught the attention of the legal community because of allegations that Rambus had shredded millions of documents prior to initiating a slew of litigation. The &lt;a href="http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/06-1579.pdf"&gt;opinion&lt;/a&gt; published April 30 overturns previous decisions on the grounds that they did not have the requisit jurisdiction. For more on the history of the case, see the &lt;a href="http://www.rambus.org/"&gt;Rambus.org&lt;/a&gt; website.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6866334915313215870?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6866334915313215870/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6866334915313215870' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6866334915313215870'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6866334915313215870'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/rambus-wins-on-appeal.html' title='Rambus Wins On Appeal'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1085936761268070915</id><published>2008-04-25T17:18:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-25T17:24:23.387-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='internet'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='general'/><title type='text'>The Future Of The Internet</title><content type='html'>The US Senate &lt;a href="http://commerce.senate.gov/public/"&gt;Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation&lt;/a&gt; met recently to discuss a rather timely topic: "&lt;a href="http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&amp;amp;Hearing_ID=4c66f979-3001-490a-a985-5be63951adb7"&gt;the future of the internet&lt;/a&gt;." You can see either a &lt;a href="rtsp://video.webcastcenter.com/srs_g2/commerce042208.rm"&gt;webcast&lt;/a&gt; of the hearing or read some of the prepared testimony (see FCC Chairman &lt;a href="http://commerce.senate.gov/public/_files/KevinMartinFutureoftheInternetTestimony.pdf"&gt;Kevin Martin's testimony&lt;/a&gt;, in particular).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1085936761268070915?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1085936761268070915/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1085936761268070915' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1085936761268070915'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1085936761268070915'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/future-of-internet.html' title='The Future Of The Internet'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6781198975918182160</id><published>2008-04-14T16:58:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-14T17:06:44.176-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>New Suits Target Information On Store Receipts</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1207564980737"&gt;This National Law Journal article&lt;/a&gt; discusses a recent increase in suits against companies who are alledgely failing to comply with the &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fcradoc.pdf"&gt;Fair Credit Reporting Act&lt;/a&gt; (FACTA). One of the provisions of FACTA prohibits a company from printing more than the last 5 digits of a credit card number on the customer's receipt. According to the article, more than 300 class actions have been filed against a number of companies, including Toys "R" Us Inc. and AMC Entertainment Holdings.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6781198975918182160?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6781198975918182160/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6781198975918182160' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6781198975918182160'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6781198975918182160'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/new-suits-target-information-on-store.html' title='New Suits Target Information On Store Receipts'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1902365219932257597</id><published>2008-04-14T13:16:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-14T13:22:09.893-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>Life Sentence For Identity Theft?</title><content type='html'>According to &lt;a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/annearundel/bal-md.identity12apr12,0,3353015.story"&gt;this Baltimore Sun&lt;/a&gt; article, a Maryland woman indicted on identity theft charges could face life in prison. Belinda Marie Glock, 33, was indicted on counts of aggravated identity theft (&lt;a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001028----000-.html"&gt;18 USC 1028A(a)(1)&lt;/a&gt;) and fraud in connection with access devices (&lt;a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001029----000-.html"&gt;18 USC 1029(a)(2)&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1902365219932257597?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1902365219932257597/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1902365219932257597' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1902365219932257597'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1902365219932257597'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/life-sentence-for-identity-theft.html' title='Life Sentence For Identity Theft?'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-835717954238364042</id><published>2008-04-08T14:40:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-08T14:59:57.301-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='internet security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>2007 Internet Crime Report</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href="http://www.ic3.gov/media/annualreport/2007_IC3Report.pdf"&gt;2007 Internet Crime Report&lt;/a&gt;, published by the &lt;a href="http://www.ic3.gov/"&gt;Internet Crime Complaint Center &lt;/a&gt;(a partnership among the FBI, the National White Collar Crime Center, and Bureau of Justice Assistance), includes some interesting findings. The report demonstrates (not suprisingly) that internet fraud is on the rise. Reported losses were $240 million compared to $200 million in 2006. Other notable findings include that the most common crime occurred through the use of email and that those affected were more likely to be males rather than females. For IC3's previous reports &lt;a href="http://www.ic3.gov/media/annualreports.aspx"&gt;see here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-835717954238364042?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/835717954238364042/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=835717954238364042' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/835717954238364042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/835717954238364042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/2007-internet-crime-report.html' title='2007 Internet Crime Report'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-69420155856079157</id><published>2008-04-02T13:18:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-04-02T13:23:37.782-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='general'/><title type='text'>Country Cybercrime Reports</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href="http://www.coe.int/"&gt;Council of Europe&lt;/a&gt; has &lt;a href="http://www.coe.int/t/dg1/legalcooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/Documents/CountryProfiles/default_en.asp"&gt;a great page&lt;/a&gt; on Cybercrime legislation for a number of countries. Each country report contains a listing of citations to cybercrime statutes for that country as well as english language excerpts of the actual statutes.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-69420155856079157?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/69420155856079157/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=69420155856079157' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/69420155856079157'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/69420155856079157'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/country-cybercrime-reports.html' title='Country Cybercrime Reports'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-2907085580847879233</id><published>2008-03-28T11:49:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-28T11:58:49.128-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>FTC Announces Settlement With TJX, Lexis</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2008/03/datasec.shtm"&gt;FTC agreed to settle charges&lt;/a&gt; with discount retailer TJX and data broker Reed Elsevier. The FTC had sued each of the companies for failing to adequately protect the security of consumer data. Both of the FTC's suits were brought under the unfair trade practices theory under Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, &lt;a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sec_15_00000045----000-.html"&gt;15 U.S.C § 45(a)&lt;/a&gt;. The TJX Complaint is available &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0723055/080327complaint.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;; the Reed Elsevier Complaint is available &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0523094/080327complaint.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-2907085580847879233?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2907085580847879233/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=2907085580847879233' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2907085580847879233'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2907085580847879233'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/ftc-announces-settlement-with-tjx-lexis.html' title='FTC Announces Settlement With TJX, Lexis'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-5896526108733337093</id><published>2008-03-26T16:42:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-26T16:56:21.972-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>Patient Data Exposed Online</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/health/bal-te.md.dental26mar26,0,4823354.story"&gt;Today's Baltimore Sun&lt;/a&gt; reports on an incident involving Dental Network, a CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield dental HMO, in which the company accidentally exposed personal information, including Social Security numbers, of about 75,000 members on a public website. A Maryland Law (&lt;a href="http://mlis.state.md.us/2007RS/chapters_noln/Ch_531_sb0194E.pdf"&gt;SB 194&lt;/a&gt;) enacted last year requires that businesses notify consumers of a breach of their personal information "as soon as reasonably practicable after the business discovers or is notified of the breach." In this case, it took 3 weeks before CareFirst notified customers of the breach.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-5896526108733337093?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5896526108733337093/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=5896526108733337093' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5896526108733337093'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5896526108733337093'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/patient-data-exposed-online.html' title='Patient Data Exposed Online'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-4243983128079660220</id><published>2008-03-20T09:59:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2008-03-20T10:11:35.042-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>Goal Financial Settles Charges Of Failing To Safeguard Sensitive Information</title><content type='html'>Student loan company Goal Financial LLC has agreed to &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2008/03/studlend.shtm"&gt;settle with the FTC&lt;/a&gt; over charges that it failed to adequately safeguard sensitive customer information. The FTC's &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0723013/080304complaint.pdf"&gt;Complaint&lt;/a&gt; alleges a number of violations, including violations of the Commission’s Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information Rule, &lt;a href="http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/16cfr314_07.html"&gt;16 C.F.R. Part 314&lt;/a&gt;, and the Commission’s Privacy of Customer Financial Information Rule, &lt;a href="http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/16cfr313_07.html"&gt;16 C.F.R. Part 313&lt;/a&gt;. Also see the &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0723013/080304agreement.pdf"&gt;Consent Order Agreement&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-4243983128079660220?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/4243983128079660220/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=4243983128079660220' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4243983128079660220'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4243983128079660220'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/goal-financial-settles-charges-of.html' title='Goal Financial Settles Charges Of Failing To Safeguard Sensitive Information'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6089504964557281908</id><published>2008-03-04T10:02:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-04T10:11:18.433-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><title type='text'>Identity Theft At Major Financial Institutions</title><content type='html'>Until recently, there has been no way to compare the relative incidence of identity theft at major financial institutions. Chris Hoofnagle's study "&lt;a href="http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&amp;amp;context=bclt/"&gt;Measuring Identity Theft at Top Banks&lt;/a&gt;" uses a novel approach: he compared complaint data from various banks submitted by victims of identity theft, obtained through FOIA requests. The study makes clear that the incidence of identity theft is alarmingly high at our major financial institutions, but that some institutions faired better than others.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6089504964557281908?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6089504964557281908/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6089504964557281908' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6089504964557281908'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6089504964557281908'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/identity-theft-at-major-financial.html' title='Identity Theft At Major Financial Institutions'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6989644359545572825</id><published>2008-03-04T09:43:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-04T09:53:47.408-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><title type='text'>More Data Breach Resources</title><content type='html'>CSOonline has a number of interesting articles on the subject of security breach legislation. First, check out their &lt;a href="http://www.csoonline.com/read/020108/ammap/ammap.html"&gt;interactive map&lt;/a&gt; of security breach legislation. Also see their articles "&lt;a href="http://www2.csoonline.com/exclusives/column.html?CID=33533"&gt;What's New With Disclosure Legislation?&lt;/a&gt;" (interview with Proskauer Rose attorney Tanya Forsheit) and "&lt;a href="http://www2.csoonline.com/exclusives/column.html?CID=33523"&gt;The Dos And Don'ts of Disclosure Letters&lt;/a&gt;." Finally, see &lt;a href="http://blogs.csoonline.com/personal_data_exposed_how_can_we_fix_this_mess"&gt;this blog posting&lt;/a&gt; on what a federal databreach law would look like.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6989644359545572825?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6989644359545572825/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6989644359545572825' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6989644359545572825'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6989644359545572825'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/csoonline-has-number-of-interesting.html' title='More Data Breach Resources'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-7310534511291491742</id><published>2008-03-03T12:02:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-03T12:15:38.619-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='cybersquatting'/><title type='text'>Anti Cybersquatting Suits Becoming Increasingly Popular</title><content type='html'>A recent article in the &lt;em&gt;National Law Journal&lt;/em&gt; entitled "&lt;a href="http://quest.law.com/Search/Search.do?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law.com%2Fjsp%2Fsearch_display.jsp%3Fassettype%3Dpubarticle%26pub%3DNational%2520Law%2520Journal%26id%3D1203677132119%26N%3D8357" target="_blank" fn="Search.do" lid="Suits a new weapon to fight cybersquatters"&gt;Suits a new weapon to fight cybersquatters&lt;/a&gt;" (subscription) reports that companies are increasingly filing suits under the &lt;a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sec_15_00001125----000-.html"&gt;Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act of 1999&lt;/a&gt; (codified at 15 USC 1125(d)) to deal with cybersquatters who profit from their brand names. Traditionally, the preferred route for companies to resolve this type of dispute would have been through arbitration. That method has proved ineffective against increasingly sophisticated cybersquatters. As a results, many companies have begun filing law suits.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-7310534511291491742?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7310534511291491742/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=7310534511291491742' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7310534511291491742'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7310534511291491742'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/anti-cybersquatting-suits-becoming.html' title='Anti Cybersquatting Suits Becoming Increasingly Popular'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1791008417197851212</id><published>2008-02-18T11:03:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-18T11:07:12.594-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security; wireless'/><title type='text'>Wireless Security Whitepaper</title><content type='html'>Finish IT security firm &lt;a href="http://www.codenomicon.com/"&gt;Codenomicon&lt;/a&gt; recently posted this &lt;a href="http://www.codenomicon.com/resources/whitepapers/Codenomicon_Wireless_WP_v1_0.pdf"&gt;white paper&lt;/a&gt; on the current status of wireless security.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1791008417197851212?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1791008417197851212/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1791008417197851212' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1791008417197851212'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1791008417197851212'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/wireless-security-whitepaper.html' title='Wireless Security Whitepaper'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6701345453661186935</id><published>2008-02-18T10:24:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-18T10:28:30.645-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='electronic discovery'/><title type='text'>Businesses Generally Ignoring E-Discovery Rules</title><content type='html'>According to &lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Storage/Businesses-Generally-Ignoring-EDiscovery-Rules/"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/"&gt;eweek&lt;/a&gt;, a little over a year after the ediscovery rules went into effect, "about two-thirds of U.S. businesses remain unprepared to meet strict court requirements for the discovery and handling of electronic evidence."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6701345453661186935?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6701345453661186935/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6701345453661186935' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6701345453661186935'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6701345453661186935'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/businesses-generally-ignoring-e.html' title='Businesses Generally Ignoring E-Discovery Rules'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1712251825664981561</id><published>2008-02-15T09:44:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-15T09:48:43.752-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='electronic discovery'/><title type='text'>E-Discovery Guidelines In US District Courts</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href="http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/"&gt;Electronic Discovery Law blog&lt;/a&gt; compiled &lt;a href="http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/2008/02/articles/resources/updated-list-local-rules-forms-and-guidelines-of-united-states-district-courts-addressing-ediscovery-issues/"&gt;a list&lt;/a&gt; of links to the 38 US District Courts that have adopted (or at least considered) local ediscovery rules and guidelines.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1712251825664981561?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1712251825664981561/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1712251825664981561' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1712251825664981561'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1712251825664981561'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/e-discovery-guidelines-in-us-district.html' title='E-Discovery Guidelines In US District Courts'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-4799196634080535235</id><published>2008-02-14T09:49:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-14T10:02:32.174-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>Identity Theft Tops FTC Complaint List</title><content type='html'>According to the FTC's &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2008/02/fraud.pdf"&gt;annual report&lt;/a&gt; on the subject, identity theft topped the list of FTC complaints for the 7th year in a row. Roughly 32% (or over 260,000) of the Agency's 2007 complaints were due to identity theft. The report also demonstates that the most frequent type of identity theft complaint in 2007 was credit card fraud (23%). The metropolitan areas reporting the highest per capita rates of identity theft were Napa, California; Madera, California; and Greeley, Colorado.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-4799196634080535235?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/4799196634080535235/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=4799196634080535235' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4799196634080535235'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4799196634080535235'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/identity-theft-tops-ftc-complaint-list.html' title='Identity Theft Tops FTC Complaint List'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-7270147622204800205</id><published>2008-02-12T16:36:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-12T16:45:49.987-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>Annonymity On The Net</title><content type='html'>Is there a First Amendment right to speak annonymously on the internet? A recent California Appellate (&lt;a href="http://login.findlaw.com/scripts/callaw?dest=ca/caapp4th/slip/2008/h030767.html"&gt;Krinsky v. Doe 6&lt;/a&gt;) case holds that, under certain circumstances, there is. In that case, plaintiffs argued that the identity of a individual who posted "scathing verbal attacks" on an online message board against corporate officers of a Florida company should be exposed. Plaintiffs served a subpoena to have the identity of "Doe 6" disclosed but the request was denied.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-7270147622204800205?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7270147622204800205/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=7270147622204800205' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7270147622204800205'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7270147622204800205'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/annonymity-on-net.html' title='Annonymity On The Net'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-225977546185093262</id><published>2008-02-11T11:40:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-11T11:50:03.505-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bot nets'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spam'/><title type='text'>Spam Ring Indicted</title><content type='html'>A federal indictment was recently unsealed in Detroit, charging 11 people with violations of the CAN SPAM Act. The &lt;a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/mie/press/2008/2008-1-4_aralsky.pdf"&gt;DOJ release&lt;/a&gt; alleges that the defendants set up "an international scheme to make money by manipulating stock prices through illegal spam e-mail promotions." The indictment also alleges that the defendants tried to send their spam through the use of botnets.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-225977546185093262?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/225977546185093262/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=225977546185093262' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/225977546185093262'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/225977546185093262'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/spam-ring-indicted.html' title='Spam Ring Indicted'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-8448913220586029093</id><published>2008-02-07T12:19:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-07T12:38:17.383-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><title type='text'>Red Flag Regulations</title><content type='html'>The most recent National Law Journal features an article entitled "&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1201779825614"&gt;Scrambing With ID Theft Programs&lt;/a&gt;" (subscription) discussing the so-called "Red Flag Regulations" which implement two sections of the &lt;a href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_bills&amp;amp;docid=f:h2622enr.txt.pdf"&gt;Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act&lt;/a&gt;. The regulations, formally termed&lt;br /&gt;"&lt;a href="http://www.fdic.gov/news/board/07Oct16nine.pdf"&gt;Identity Theft Red Flags and Address Discrepancies under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003&lt;/a&gt;," require financial institutions and companies offering consumer credit to institute identity theft prevention programs to detect "red flags" which might signal possible foul play. The regs go into effect Nov. 1 of this year.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-8448913220586029093?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8448913220586029093/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=8448913220586029093' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8448913220586029093'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8448913220586029093'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/most-recent-national-law-journal.html' title='Red Flag Regulations'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1380805006693247008</id><published>2008-02-05T09:39:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-05T10:09:06.635-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>FTC Settlement With Life Is Good, Inc.</title><content type='html'>The FTC recently announced a &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0723046/080117agreement.pdf"&gt;Proposed Settlement&lt;/a&gt; with clothing company Life Is Good, Inc. The FTC's &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0723046/080117complaint.pdf"&gt;Complaint&lt;/a&gt; against the company had alleged that the company, contrary to it's privacy policy, failed to adequately protect and secure the sensitive information it maintained about its customers. The proposed settlement requires, among other things, that the company designate at least one employee to coordinate the security program and that the company develop reasonable procedures for selecting and supervising service providers that handle customers’ personal information.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1380805006693247008?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1380805006693247008/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1380805006693247008' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1380805006693247008'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1380805006693247008'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/ftc-recently-announced-proposed.html' title='FTC Settlement With Life Is Good, Inc.'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-7549017371339725250</id><published>2008-02-04T10:25:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-04T10:30:31.487-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>Preparing For A Data Breach</title><content type='html'>Philip Gordon of the &lt;a href="http://privacyblog.littler.com/"&gt;Workplace Privacy Counsel&lt;/a&gt; blog provides &lt;a href="http://privacyblog.littler.com/2007/08/legal/privacy-policy/what-does-the-crazy-quilt-of-security-breach-laws-mean-for-employers-as-massachusetts-becomes-the-39th-state-to-enact-one/"&gt;5 key points&lt;/a&gt; for employers to consider as they prepare for the possibility of a data breach: be prepared, train your HR professionals, determine your notice obligations, help your employees, and learn from your mistakes.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-7549017371339725250?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7549017371339725250/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=7549017371339725250' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7549017371339725250'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7549017371339725250'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/preparing-for-data-breach.html' title='Preparing For A Data Breach'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-8248394316089834151</id><published>2008-01-31T15:32:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-31T15:37:58.515-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>MD Identity Theft Task Force Issues Report</title><content type='html'>The Maryland Task Force to study Identity Theft recent published it's &lt;a href="http://mlis.state.md.us/2008RS/misc/TF_Study_Identity_Theft_Report.pdf"&gt;report&lt;/a&gt;. Over 230 pages, the report recommends, among other things, that the penalties for felony identity theft be increased, that the State ban credit card skimming devices, and that the State should enact legislation to enable a court to order the forfeiture of all property of a criminal convicted of identity theft obtained from the crime.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-8248394316089834151?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8248394316089834151/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=8248394316089834151' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8248394316089834151'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8248394316089834151'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/md-identity-theft-task-force-issues.html' title='MD Identity Theft Task Force Issues Report'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-2883331396663555881</id><published>2008-01-30T13:47:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-30T13:52:05.758-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='electronic discovery'/><title type='text'>EDD In Criminal Investigations</title><content type='html'>The DOJ's publication, "&lt;a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/s&amp;amp;smanual2002.htm"&gt;Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations&lt;/a&gt;," provides a comprehensive guide to the legal issues that arise when federal law enforcement agents search and seize computers during criminal investigations. Topics covered include the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, workplace privacy, and the law of electronic surveillance.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-2883331396663555881?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2883331396663555881/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=2883331396663555881' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2883331396663555881'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2883331396663555881'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/edd-in-criminal-investigations.html' title='EDD In Criminal Investigations'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1532694724262752109</id><published>2008-01-24T09:57:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-24T10:17:47.712-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='electronic discovery'/><title type='text'>EDD Opinions By Judge Grimm</title><content type='html'>In the past few years, &lt;a href="http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/webdatapages1/JudgesBio/grimm.htm"&gt;Judge Paul W. Grimm&lt;/a&gt; of the US District Court in Maryland has issued a couple of groundbreaking electronic discovery opinions: &lt;a href="http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/Opinions152/Opinions/Lorraine%20v.%20Markel%20-%20ESIADMISSIBILITY%20OPINION.pdf"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Company&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (DMd May 4, 2007) and &lt;a href="http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/publications/opinions/Opinions/HOPSONvBCPDNov.05.pdf"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hopson v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (D.Md.2005). For more on &lt;em&gt;Lorraine&lt;/em&gt; see &lt;a href="http://www.lordbissell.com/Newsstand/2007-06_EDiscovery_Neiditz_Hatfield_Safer.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://postprocess.wordpress.com/category/magistrate-judge-paul-w-grimm/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. For a summary of the &lt;em&gt;Hopson&lt;/em&gt; decision see &lt;a href="http://www.krollontrack.com/newsletters/clu/jan06.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Judge Grimm has also authored a &lt;a href="http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/news/news/ESIProtocol.pdf"&gt;Suggested Protocol For Discovery of Electronically Stored Information&lt;/a&gt; discussed in an &lt;a href="http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/suggested-protocol-for-e-discovery.html"&gt;earlier post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1532694724262752109?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1532694724262752109/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1532694724262752109' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1532694724262752109'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1532694724262752109'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/edd-opinions-by-judge-grimm.html' title='EDD Opinions By Judge Grimm'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-5505920049261438301</id><published>2008-01-09T09:48:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-09T09:59:19.479-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>Sears Sued For Failing To Adequately Protect Website</title><content type='html'>This &lt;a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2008/01/class_action_suit_alleges_sear.html?nav=rss_blog"&gt;Washington Post article&lt;/a&gt; reports on a class action suit against Sears for failing to adequately secure the personal information on its website managemyhome.com. The site's security vulnerabilities came to light after &lt;a href="http://www.benedelman.org/"&gt;Ben Edelman&lt;/a&gt; pointed out the ease with which anyone could access the purchase history of the site's users. See &lt;a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/sears%20complaint.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for a copy of the Complaint filed in Cook County, Illinois.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-5505920049261438301?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5505920049261438301/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=5505920049261438301' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5505920049261438301'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5505920049261438301'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/sears-sued-for-failing-to-adequately.html' title='Sears Sued For Failing To Adequately Protect Website'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6278420966252336491</id><published>2008-01-03T11:14:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-03T11:27:27.578-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='defamation'/><title type='text'>Google Not Required To Disclose Identity of Blogger</title><content type='html'>Google has no obligation to disclose the identity of a blogger who used Blogger.com to allegedly defame a Long Island school board member. Judge Marcy S. Friedman of the New York County Supreme Court called the blogger's statements opinions rather than actionable statements of fact. As such, there is no case for defamation and Google has no obligation to turn over the records. &lt;a href="http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/fcas/fcas_docs/2007oct/3001020632007001sciv.pdf"&gt;Greenbaum v. Google Inc.&lt;/a&gt; (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Oct. 23, 2007).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6278420966252336491?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6278420966252336491/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6278420966252336491' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6278420966252336491'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6278420966252336491'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/google-has-no-obligation-to-disclose.html' title='Google Not Required To Disclose Identity of Blogger'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-8135828595922930582</id><published>2008-01-02T14:39:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-02T14:45:09.165-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>Security Breach Laws</title><content type='html'>The National Conference of State Legislatures site contains &lt;a href="http://www.ncsl.org/programs/lis/cip/priv/breachlaws.htm"&gt;a list&lt;/a&gt; of all state security breach notification laws. The Maryland Statute (&lt;a href="http://michie.lexisnexis.com/maryland/lpExt.dll?f=templates&amp;amp;eMail=Y&amp;amp;fn=main-h.htm&amp;amp;cp=mdcode/4231/5619/5b30/5b31"&gt;Commercial Law 14-3501 et. seq.&lt;/a&gt;) was recently amended by &lt;a href="http://mlis.state.md.us/2007RS/chapters_noln/Ch_531_sb0194E.pdf"&gt;SB 194&lt;/a&gt; which went into effect Jan. 1 of '08.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-8135828595922930582?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8135828595922930582/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=8135828595922930582' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8135828595922930582'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8135828595922930582'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/security-breach-laws.html' title='Security Breach Laws'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-2189567287705324142</id><published>2008-01-02T14:11:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-02T14:23:31.741-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='general'/><title type='text'>Maryland Computer Services Tax</title><content type='html'>In a special session, the Maryland legislature recently increased taxes for the first time since 1977. Included in the tax bill is a special tax on computer services. Although &lt;a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-md.tax09dec09,0,7956271.story"&gt;critics vow to get the bill repealed&lt;/a&gt;, barring any actions by the courts or legislature, the bill is scheduled to go into effect July 1. The bill is Section 3 (p. 24) of &lt;a href="http://mlis.state.md.us/2007s1/chapters_noln/Ch_3_sb0002E.pdf"&gt;Senate Bill 2&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-2189567287705324142?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2189567287705324142/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=2189567287705324142' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2189567287705324142'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2189567287705324142'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2008/01/maryland-computer-services-tax.html' title='Maryland Computer Services Tax'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1738552947143180022</id><published>2007-12-27T09:36:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-27T09:46:10.249-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><title type='text'>Costs Of A Data Breach</title><content type='html'>A &lt;a href="http://www.vontu.com/uploadedfiles/global/Ponemon-Cost-of-a-Data-Breach-2007.pdf"&gt;new study&lt;/a&gt; of 35 companies that incurred a data breach demonstrates how expensive thse incidents are to companies. The study reports that the average total cost per reporting company was more than $6.3 million per breach and ranged from $225,000 to almost $35 million. The study also indicates that these costs are increasing each year and that financial service firms are impacted the most.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1738552947143180022?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1738552947143180022/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1738552947143180022' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1738552947143180022'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1738552947143180022'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/costs-of-data-breach.html' title='Costs Of A Data Breach'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-908581705579805563</id><published>2007-12-19T12:15:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-19T12:29:35.263-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>FTC Testifies On ID Theft</title><content type='html'>In testimony yesterday before the House Judiciary Committee’s &lt;a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/committeestructure.aspx?committee=6"&gt;Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security&lt;/a&gt;, the FTC's Joel Winston testified that since 2001 the Commission has brought 14 cases since against businesses that failed to implement reasonable security measures to protect sensitive consumer data. In each of those cases the security vulnerabilities were multiple and systemic, and the preventative measures were inexpensive and readily available. The full text of the testimony is available &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/testimony/P065404idtheft.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-908581705579805563?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/908581705579805563/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=908581705579805563' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/908581705579805563'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/908581705579805563'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/ftc-testifies-on-id-theft.html' title='FTC Testifies On ID Theft'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-385544916914853365</id><published>2007-12-06T10:12:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-06T10:20:02.738-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><title type='text'>Guide For Businesses On Protecting Personal Information</title><content type='html'>Entitled “&lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/infosecurity/"&gt;Protecting Personal Information: A Guide for Business&lt;/a&gt;,” this new tutorial from the FTC outlines a framework businesses can use to implement a data security plan. The framework offered in the tutorial is built on 5 principles:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Take stock &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Scale down. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Lock it.  &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Pitch it. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Plan ahead. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-385544916914853365?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/385544916914853365/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=385544916914853365' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/385544916914853365'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/385544916914853365'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/guide-for-businesses-on-protecting.html' title='Guide For Businesses On Protecting Personal Information'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-2653943699585868729</id><published>2007-12-06T09:58:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-06T10:10:18.055-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='internet security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='bot nets'/><title type='text'>New CRS Report On Botnets, Cybercrime</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.loc.gov/crsinfo/"&gt;CRS&lt;/a&gt; recently published a new report entitled "&lt;a href="http://164.106.251.250/docs/netsec/Botnets_Cybercrime_Cyberterrorism_Rpt_Congress.pdf"&gt;Botnets, Cybercrime, and Cyberterrorism: Vulnerabilities and Policy Issues&lt;/a&gt;." Among the findings in the report are that "cybercrime is becoming more organized and established as a transnational business....[and that] designs for cybercrime botnets arebecoming more sophisticated, and future botnet architectures may be more resistant to computer security countermeasures."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-2653943699585868729?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2653943699585868729/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=2653943699585868729' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2653943699585868729'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2653943699585868729'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/new-crs-report-on-botnets-cybercrime.html' title='New CRS Report On Botnets, Cybercrime'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-7192388113491518881</id><published>2007-12-03T12:11:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-12-03T12:18:23.545-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>Study Shows Low Awareness of Security Freeze Laws</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.aarp.org/research/frauds-scams/fraud/security_freeze.html"&gt;A study&lt;/a&gt; conducted by the AARP indicates that although consumers have a high concern about identity theft, their awareness of security freeze legislation remains extremely low. The study indicates that more than half (57%) of the respondents did not know where to turn for security freeze information. For the full text of the study, &lt;a href="http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/consume/freeze_leg.pdf"&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;. For a summary, &lt;a href="http://www.aarp.org/research/credit-debt/credit/dd160_security_freeze.html"&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-7192388113491518881?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7192388113491518881/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=7192388113491518881' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7192388113491518881'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7192388113491518881'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/study-shows-low-awareness-of-security.html' title='Study Shows Low Awareness of Security Freeze Laws'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6890597036424602728</id><published>2007-11-12T15:59:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-12T16:04:58.622-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>First Prosecution In File Sharing ID Theft</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://news.technology.findlaw.com/ap/o/632/11-06-2007/77f2000a3695f688.html"&gt;This AP news story&lt;/a&gt; reports on the case of Gregory Kopiloff. According to the Justice Department this is the first prosecution against someone accused of using file-sharing to commit identity theft. Kopiloff used file sharing programs to gain access to the personal information of more than 50 people. He then used that information to fraudulently buy and resell more than $73,000 in merchandise.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6890597036424602728?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6890597036424602728/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6890597036424602728' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6890597036424602728'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6890597036424602728'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/11/first-prosecution-in-file-sharing-id.html' title='First Prosecution In File Sharing ID Theft'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-5796688668056165076</id><published>2007-11-08T09:35:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-08T09:43:13.902-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>The Prevalence of Identity Theft</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href="http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/"&gt;Bureau of Justice Statistics&lt;/a&gt; recently published a &lt;a href="http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/it05.pdf"&gt;report on identity theft&lt;/a&gt;. According to the report, in 2005, 6.4 million households (5.5% of all households in the US) discovered that at least one member experienced one or more types of identity theft. Of this group, unauthorized use of an existing credit card was the the most prevalent type of identity theft (about 3 million households). Given that the data in the report is from 2005, the statistics today would likely be significantly larger.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-5796688668056165076?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5796688668056165076/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=5796688668056165076' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5796688668056165076'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5796688668056165076'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/11/prevalence-of-identity-theft.html' title='The Prevalence of Identity Theft'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-6374973585941834137</id><published>2007-11-05T16:34:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2007-11-12T16:06:53.160-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='copyright'/><title type='text'>Fair Use For User Generated Content</title><content type='html'>With the growth of user generated content (UGC) services like &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/"&gt;Youtube.com&lt;/a&gt;, the question of what is considered fair use is only now beginning to be defined. &lt;a href="http://www.eff.org/issues/ip-and-free-speech/fair-use-principles-usergen"&gt;This article&lt;/a&gt; from the &lt;a href="http://www.eff.org/"&gt;Electronic Frontier Foundation&lt;/a&gt; provides a framework for applying fair use in the UCG context. Hats off to &lt;a href="http://www.bespacific.com/"&gt;beSpacific&lt;/a&gt; for this catch.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-6374973585941834137?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/6374973585941834137/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=6374973585941834137' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6374973585941834137'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/6374973585941834137'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/11/fair-use-for-user-generated-content.html' title='Fair Use For User Generated Content'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-2266148861991381623</id><published>2007-10-25T09:50:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-25T09:55:22.909-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='electronic discovery'/><title type='text'>E-Discovery Local Rules</title><content type='html'>Following on yesterday's post, Maryland is not the only state where federal courts have proposed or enacted e-discovery local rules. As &lt;a href="http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/2007/10/articles/resources/updated-list-local-rules-of-united-states-district-courts-addressing-ediscovery-issues/"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; shows, at least 32 US District Courts  have enacted or proposed special rules addressing electronic discovery.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-2266148861991381623?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2266148861991381623/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=2266148861991381623' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2266148861991381623'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2266148861991381623'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/e-discovery-local-rules.html' title='E-Discovery Local Rules'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-74098374612398273</id><published>2007-10-24T09:51:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-24T09:56:31.508-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='electronic discovery'/><title type='text'>Suggested Protocol For E-Discovery</title><content type='html'>Judge Paul W. Grimm of the US District Court of Maryland recently posted this "&lt;a href="http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/news/news/ESIProtocol.pdf"&gt;Suggested Protocol For Discovery of Electronically Stored Information&lt;/a&gt;." Although not currently adopted, the document is a "working model" which may at some point be recommended for adoption.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-74098374612398273?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/74098374612398273/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=74098374612398273' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/74098374612398273'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/74098374612398273'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/suggested-protocol-for-e-discovery.html' title='Suggested Protocol For E-Discovery'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-611075637509191734</id><published>2007-10-24T09:27:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-10-24T09:43:13.963-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='general'/><title type='text'>Website Liability For User Posted Content</title><content type='html'>This &lt;a href="http://technology.findlaw.com/articles/00006/011015.html"&gt;Findlaw article&lt;/a&gt; by Eric Sinrod discusses when websites will be held liable for the content posted by others on their site. In particular, the article discusses the case of &lt;a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0456916p.pdf"&gt;Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com, LLC&lt;/a&gt; where the website &lt;a href="http://www.roommates.com/"&gt;http://www.roommates.com/&lt;/a&gt; was sued by the Fair Housing Councils of San Fernando Valley and San Diego. The plaintiffs alleged that the site's practice of allowing users to filter out potential roommates according to user-selected criteria violated the &lt;a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/42/chapters/45/subchapters/i/sections/section_3601.html"&gt;Fair Housing Act (FHA)&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-611075637509191734?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/611075637509191734/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=611075637509191734' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/611075637509191734'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/611075637509191734'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/website-liability-for-user-posted.html' title='Website Liability For User Posted Content'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-468645271246939236</id><published>2007-10-09T09:53:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-12-27T09:47:29.101-05:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>'07 Global Security Survey</title><content type='html'>Deloitte recently published it's &lt;a href="http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/ca_en_Global_Security_Survey.final.en.pdf"&gt;annual review&lt;/a&gt; of the state of information security in the financial services industry. The survey includes data from 169 global financial institutions in 32 countries. Key findings include: companies are moving away from a sole focus on shoring up infrastructure against external breaches and are focusing instead on a a layered approach of preventative, detective and corrective controls; respondents identified access and identity management (50%) as their top operational initiative; generic countermeasures (encryption, access control, and network security) are proving inadequate at protecting on-line applications; and in an organization’s attempt to prevent security breaches, people remain the weakest link.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-468645271246939236?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/468645271246939236/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=468645271246939236' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/468645271246939236'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/468645271246939236'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/07-global-security-survey.html' title='&apos;07 Global Security Survey'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-4047978695304156093</id><published>2007-09-25T17:35:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-25T17:37:49.137-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>A Global Privacy Standard?</title><content type='html'>A senior executive at Google stated today that he agreed on the need for a basic set of global privacy protections. See &lt;a href="http://www.news.com/Google-sees-urgent-need-for-global-privacy-rules/2100-1028_3-6209844.html?tag=item"&gt;this CNET article&lt;/a&gt; for more.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-4047978695304156093?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/4047978695304156093/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=4047978695304156093' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4047978695304156093'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/4047978695304156093'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/global-privacy-standard.html' title='A Global Privacy Standard?'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-7115548314186025933</id><published>2007-09-25T12:54:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-25T12:58:50.582-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='internet security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>Domain Name Theft</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119068079815138145.html?mod=fpa_editors_picks"&gt;This &lt;em&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/em&gt; article&lt;/a&gt; examines how domain name hijacking is becoming an increasingly prevalent phenomenon.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-7115548314186025933?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7115548314186025933/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=7115548314186025933' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7115548314186025933'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7115548314186025933'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/domain-name-theft.html' title='Domain Name Theft'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-9135274028882074665</id><published>2007-09-24T09:52:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-24T10:20:39.336-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>EU Data Transfer Regulations</title><content type='html'>U.S. companies transferring personal data from Europe to the U.S. must follow prescribed methods to protect data in accord with EU data privacy protection laws. Complying with this "adequacy requirement" means satisfying each European nation's data protection authorities. Binding Corporate Rules allow a company to design a single set of internal rules that work on their own data protection policies for intranet sites, databases and other electronic business tools that also comply with EU requirements. For more on this, see &lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1190278978892"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; from the &lt;em&gt;New York Law Journal&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-9135274028882074665?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/9135274028882074665/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=9135274028882074665' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/9135274028882074665'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/9135274028882074665'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/eu-data-transfer-regulation.html' title='EU Data Transfer Regulations'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-8814829588092089041</id><published>2007-09-17T10:53:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-17T11:40:51.937-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>Robot Exclusion Protocol</title><content type='html'>If you are concerned, as I am, about the privacy threats posed by Google's search bots, take a look at the &lt;a href="http://www.ftrain.com/robot_exclusion_protocol.html"&gt;following post&lt;/a&gt; from Paul Ford of &lt;a href="http://www.ftrain.com/"&gt;Ftrain.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-8814829588092089041?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8814829588092089041/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=8814829588092089041' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8814829588092089041'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8814829588092089041'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/robot-exclusion-protocol.html' title='Robot Exclusion Protocol'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-672045916802849829</id><published>2007-09-11T12:34:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-11T12:38:48.138-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='VOIP'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='internet security'/><title type='text'>VOIP Security Whitepaper From IBM</title><content type='html'>This &lt;a href="http://www.infosecwriters.com/text_resources/pdf/IBM_ISS_vishing_guide_GOllmann.pdf"&gt;16-page whitepaper&lt;/a&gt; from IBM discusses "vishing." From the intro, "Vishing is the practice of leveraging IP-based voice messaging technologies (primarily Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP) to socially engineer the intended victim into providing personal, financial or other confidential infor-mation for the purpose of financial reward." The term "vishing" is a contraction of the terms 'voice' and 'phishing.'&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-672045916802849829?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/672045916802849829/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=672045916802849829' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/672045916802849829'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/672045916802849829'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/voip-security-whitepaper-from-ibm.html' title='VOIP Security Whitepaper From IBM'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1282520207261526605</id><published>2007-09-07T09:54:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-07T09:59:41.214-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>DOT Issues Memo On Loss of Personal Information</title><content type='html'>The US Department of Transporation issued &lt;a href="http://www.oig.dot.gov/StreamFile?file=/data/pdfdocs/LaptopReportFinalAug282007.pdf"&gt;this memorandum&lt;/a&gt; on the theft of two laptops belonging to the Office of The Inspector General. Both laptops contained large amounts of Sensitive Personally Identifiable Information.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1282520207261526605?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1282520207261526605/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1282520207261526605' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1282520207261526605'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1282520207261526605'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/dot-issues-memo-on-loss-of-personal.html' title='DOT Issues Memo On Loss of Personal Information'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-8266698186702874252</id><published>2007-09-06T09:48:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-06T09:55:35.958-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='electronic discovery'/><title type='text'>National Security Archive Sues White House Over Emails</title><content type='html'>See this &lt;a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20070905/index.htm"&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt;. The &lt;a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20070905/complaint.pdf"&gt;suit&lt;/a&gt;, filed in the US District Court of the District of Columbia, demands the recovery and preservation of 5 million emails which were allegedly deleted by the White House during the period of March 2003 and October 2005.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-8266698186702874252?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8266698186702874252/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=8266698186702874252' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8266698186702874252'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8266698186702874252'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/national-security-archive-sues-white.html' title='National Security Archive Sues White House Over Emails'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1246544603495677151</id><published>2007-09-05T15:28:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-05T15:36:46.977-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='trade secrets'/><title type='text'>Source Code For Breathalyzer Softwere Held Not To Be Trade Secret</title><content type='html'>See &lt;a href="http://www.duiblog.com/2007/09/04/secret-breathalyzer-software-finally-revealed/"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; from the DUI Blog. A number of manufacturers of breathalyzer software had refused to disclose their source close, claiming they were trade secrets. The Supreme Court of New Jersey, however, recently ruled that the source code for this software is not a trade secret and therefore the company should be forced to reveal the code.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1246544603495677151?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1246544603495677151/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1246544603495677151' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1246544603495677151'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1246544603495677151'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/source-code-for-breathalyzer-softwere.html' title='Source Code For Breathalyzer Softwere Held Not To Be Trade Secret'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-9137347401777704673</id><published>2007-09-05T10:24:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-05T10:33:44.529-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='copyright'/><title type='text'>Online Listing Qualifies For Copyright Protection</title><content type='html'>In a decision published on June 21 (&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200413653.pdf"&gt;BUC Int'l Corp. v. Int'l Yacht Council&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;), the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that &lt;a href="http://www.buc.com/"&gt;BUC International Corp.'s&lt;/a&gt; method of organizing its online listings of yachts for sale was unique enough to qualify for copyright protection. The defendant had "scraped" adds off of BUC's website.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-9137347401777704673?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/9137347401777704673/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=9137347401777704673' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/9137347401777704673'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/9137347401777704673'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/online-listing-qualifies-for-copyright.html' title='Online Listing Qualifies For Copyright Protection'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-5335338214732048760</id><published>2007-09-05T10:12:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-05T10:15:02.253-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>Executive Office of The President Not Subject To FOIA</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/oa/foia/eop-foia.html"&gt;This page&lt;/a&gt; on the White House website states "The Office of Administration, whose sole function is to advise and assist the President, and which has no substantial independent authority, is not subject to FOIA and related authorities."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-5335338214732048760?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5335338214732048760/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=5335338214732048760' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5335338214732048760'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5335338214732048760'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/executive-office-of-president-not.html' title='Executive Office of The President Not Subject To FOIA'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1214546551898749505</id><published>2007-08-17T10:59:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-17T11:12:33.797-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='cybersquatting'/><title type='text'>Anti-Cybersquatting Enforcement</title><content type='html'>Columnist Eric Sinrod reports in &lt;a href="http://technology.findlaw.com/articles/00006/010929.html"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; how a non-profit group called &lt;a href="http://www.cadna.org/"&gt;The Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse&lt;/a&gt; (CADNA) is leading the fight against cybersquatting.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1214546551898749505?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1214546551898749505/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1214546551898749505' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1214546551898749505'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1214546551898749505'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/anti-cybersquatting-enforcement.html' title='Anti-Cybersquatting Enforcement'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-7421137842232387085</id><published>2007-08-16T09:57:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-16T10:10:10.643-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='copyright'/><title type='text'>Youtube's Failure To Dismiss Tur Suit</title><content type='html'>According to an article in &lt;em&gt;Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter&lt;/em&gt; (14 No. 9 Andrews Intell. Prop. Litig. Rep. 2) on Robert Tur's copyright suit against Youtube.com (&lt;em&gt;Tur v. Youtube Inc.&lt;/em&gt;), Youtube's motion to dismiss was refused because the company failed to show that it has the "right and ability to control" the content posted on its site. For background on this case, see &lt;a href="http://www.hollywoodreporteresq.com/thresq/litigation/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003602227"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;. To see the text of the orders, &lt;a href="http://www.hollywoodreporteresq.com/thresq/photos/Turv.YouTube_order-1.pdf"&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.hollywoodreporteresq.com/thresq/photos/Turv.YouTube_order-2.pdf"&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-7421137842232387085?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/7421137842232387085/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=7421137842232387085' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7421137842232387085'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/7421137842232387085'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/according-to-article-in-andrews.html' title='Youtube&apos;s Failure To Dismiss Tur Suit'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-3339105737699485637</id><published>2007-08-16T09:45:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-16T09:55:22.861-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Antitrust Concerns In Cyberspace</title><content type='html'>For an interesting case applying antitrust principles to the cyber arena, see this recent case from the US District Court of the Central District of California (&lt;a href="http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/CACD/RecentPubOp.nsf/bb61c530eab0911c882567cf005ac6f9/d856b7ca613a5b36882572fe0051065c/$FILE/CV06-6994AHM.pdf"&gt;Liveuniverse v. Myspace&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-3339105737699485637?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/3339105737699485637/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=3339105737699485637' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3339105737699485637'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3339105737699485637'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/antitrust-concerns-in-cyberspace.html' title='Antitrust Concerns In Cyberspace'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-8149670720195808191</id><published>2007-08-14T09:41:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-14T09:46:50.551-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spam'/><title type='text'>A Setback For Spammers</title><content type='html'>See &lt;a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,135680-c,spam/article.html#"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; from PC World: "Researchers at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) said this week they've discovered a critical weakness in the spam ecosystem that could be used to help cut off the promise of economic returns fuelling the huge growth in spam levels." For a brief history of spam, see &lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/08/06/070806fa_fact_specter/?printable=true"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; from the &lt;em&gt;New Yorker&lt;/em&gt; entitled "Damn Spam."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-8149670720195808191?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8149670720195808191/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=8149670720195808191' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8149670720195808191'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8149670720195808191'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/setback-for-spammers.html' title='A Setback For Spammers'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-3133772594109877907</id><published>2007-08-13T11:49:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-13T11:55:27.155-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='electronic discovery'/><title type='text'>Authenticating Email</title><content type='html'>Check out today's article from Law.com entitled "&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1186736525985"&gt;Authenticating Email Evidence As Evidence&lt;/a&gt;." As the authors point out, part of what makes authenticating email for use as evidence difficult is that each email is not an independent entity--it is part of a chain of emails which form a discussion.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-3133772594109877907?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/3133772594109877907/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=3133772594109877907' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3133772594109877907'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3133772594109877907'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/authenticating-email.html' title='Authenticating Email'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-1983179062050778494</id><published>2007-08-09T15:32:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-09T15:34:55.998-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><title type='text'>FTC On Laptop Security</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/"&gt;FTC&lt;/a&gt; recently published &lt;a href="http://onguardonline.gov/laptop.html"&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; offering suggestions for maintaining laptop security.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-1983179062050778494?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/1983179062050778494/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=1983179062050778494' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1983179062050778494'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/1983179062050778494'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/ftc-on-laptop-security.html' title='FTC On Laptop Security'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-826673604289177383</id><published>2007-08-07T16:26:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-07T16:34:09.240-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>Financial Privacy Legislation</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href="http://www.ncsl.org/"&gt;National Conference of State Legislatures&lt;/a&gt; provides &lt;a href="http://www.ncsl.org/programs/lis/privacy/financeprivacy.htm"&gt;this list&lt;/a&gt; of financial privacy legislation--both introduced and enacted--from all 50 states for the years 2000-2006. The list includes links to the full text of the legislation. The same site also provides &lt;a href="http://www.ncsl.org/programs/lis/cip/priv/breach.htm"&gt;a 50-state listing&lt;/a&gt; of security breach legislation.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-826673604289177383?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/826673604289177383/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=826673604289177383' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/826673604289177383'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/826673604289177383'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/financial-privacy-legislation.html' title='Financial Privacy Legislation'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-646051825123735962</id><published>2007-08-06T16:19:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-06T16:33:52.284-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='copyright'/><title type='text'>Visa Held Not To Be Vicarious Infringer</title><content type='html'>A recent 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision, &lt;a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0515170p.pdf"&gt;Perfect 10 Inc. v. Visa International Service Association et al.&lt;/a&gt;, found that credit card companies that process transactions over the internet that ultimately involve infringed goods, are not themselves liable for vicarious infringement. See &lt;a href="http://www.lexisone.com/news/nlibrary/m072307b.html"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; from Mealey's for more.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-646051825123735962?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/646051825123735962/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=646051825123735962' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/646051825123735962'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/646051825123735962'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/visa-held-not-to-be-vicarious-infringer.html' title='Visa Held Not To Be Vicarious Infringer'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-451671299805815250</id><published>2007-08-02T16:06:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-06T16:35:43.703-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><title type='text'>GAO Report On Cybercrime</title><content type='html'>GAO recently published a new report entitled "&lt;a href="http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07705.pdf"&gt;Public and Private Entities Face Challenges in Addressing Cyber Threats&lt;/a&gt;." From the Executive Summary: "Cybercrime has significant economic impacts and threatens U.S. national security interests. Various studies and experts estimate the direct economic impact from cybercrime to be in the billions of dollars annually. The annual loss due to computer crime was estimated to be $67.2 billion for U.S. organizations, according to a 2005 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) survey."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-451671299805815250?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/451671299805815250/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=451671299805815250' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/451671299805815250'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/451671299805815250'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/gao-report-on-cybercrime.html' title='GAO Report On Cybercrime'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-2941830146808959296</id><published>2007-07-30T14:32:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-07-30T14:34:34.877-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><title type='text'>iPhone Vulernable To Hackers</title><content type='html'>This &lt;a href="http://news.technology.findlaw.com/ap/ht/58/07-23-2007/00080020276c61c1.html"&gt;AP article&lt;/a&gt; reports on a vulnerability within Apple's iPhone which could make it susceptible to hackers.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-2941830146808959296?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2941830146808959296/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=2941830146808959296' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2941830146808959296'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2941830146808959296'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/iphone-vulernable-to-hackers.html' title='iPhone Vulernable To Hackers'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-8470999005716956043</id><published>2007-07-30T10:41:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-07-30T10:45:55.718-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='copyright'/><title type='text'>YouTube To Institute Copyright Filtering</title><content type='html'>See &lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/07/27/Google-plans-YouTube-antipiracy-tool-for-September_1.html"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; from InfoWorld and &lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/07/copyright-filte.html"&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; from Wired News which discuss Google's intent to implement an antipiracy tool on it's YouTube website. According to the articles, Google plans to implement the changes as soon as this Fall.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-8470999005716956043?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8470999005716956043/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=8470999005716956043' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8470999005716956043'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8470999005716956043'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/youtube-to-institute-copyright.html' title='YouTube To Institute Copyright Filtering'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-5896319816193034623</id><published>2007-07-26T18:11:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-07-26T18:24:01.021-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>Government Barred From Accessing Emails From ISP</title><content type='html'>In a recent 6th Circuit decision, &lt;a href="http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/warshak_v_usa/6th_circuit_decision_upholding_injunction.pdf"&gt;Warshak v. United States&lt;/a&gt; (June 18, 2007), the Court ruled that email users have a reasonable expectation of privacy and thus barred the government from accessing emails from the Internet Service Provider of a criminal defendant.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-5896319816193034623?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5896319816193034623/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=5896319816193034623' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5896319816193034623'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5896319816193034623'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/government-barred-from-accessing-emails.html' title='Government Barred From Accessing Emails From ISP'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-2808909202272689585</id><published>2007-07-25T16:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-09-10T12:42:05.087-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='internet security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='copyright'/><title type='text'>Law Firm Cleared of Hacking Opponents' Web Archives</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1185181604443"&gt;Yesterday's New Jersey Law Journal&lt;/a&gt; reported on a case (&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/07D0852P.pdf"&gt;Healthcare Advocates Inc. v. Harding Earley Follmer &amp;amp; Frailey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;) in which a law firm had been sued for allegedgly violating copyright and anti-hacking laws when it recovered old web pages belonging to its client's adversary. The opinion by Judge Robert Kelley, Jr. of the US District Court of Eastern District of Pennsylvania stated that the firm, in accessing pages from the &lt;a href="http://www.archive.org/"&gt;Way Back Machine&lt;/a&gt;, did not violate any law. As stated in the opinion, "They did not 'pick the lock' and avoid or bypass the protective measure, because there was no lock to pick...Nor did the Harding firm steal passwords to get around a protective barrier... The Harding firm could not 'avoid' or 'bypass' a digital wall that was not there." A copy of the &lt;a href="http://www.geocities.com/bledrydudenet/Healthcare_Advocates_v._Harding_Complaint__FINAL.pdf.pdf"&gt;Complaint&lt;/a&gt; is available here. The opinion does not appear to be online.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-2808909202272689585?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/2808909202272689585/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=2808909202272689585' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2808909202272689585'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/2808909202272689585'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/law-firm-cleared-of-hacking-opponents.html' title='Law Firm Cleared of Hacking Opponents&apos; Web Archives'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-5040762698279019986</id><published>2007-07-23T10:20:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-07-23T10:24:19.735-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='general'/><title type='text'>Top Ten Opt Out List</title><content type='html'>Also from the &lt;a href="http://www.worldprivacyforum.org/"&gt;World Privacy Forum&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href="http://www.worldprivacyforum.org/toptenoptout.html"&gt;The World Privacy Forum's Top Ten Opt Out Lis&lt;/a&gt;t is "a list of what top things to opt out of, and how to opt out. Millions of people have heard about the Do Not Call list, an opt out list that gets people off of telemarketing lists. But many fewer people have heard about the other opt outs that are available, like those that can take people out of data broker lists or opt outs that can stop schools from giving out directory information like email and home addresses."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-5040762698279019986?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5040762698279019986/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=5040762698279019986' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5040762698279019986'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5040762698279019986'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/also-from-world-privacy-forum-world.html' title='Top Ten Opt Out List'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-5035881340354084886</id><published>2007-07-23T10:00:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-07-23T10:20:33.828-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT Security'/><title type='text'>State Security Freeze Laws</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.worldprivacyforum.org/creditfreeze.html#statesecurityfreezelist"&gt;This page&lt;/a&gt; from the &lt;a href="http://www.worldprivacyforum.org/"&gt;World Privacy Forum&lt;/a&gt; provides an overview of state security freeze laws, as well as a list of states with enacted security freeze legislation. Each entry includes a link to the full text of the that state's security freeze statute.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-5035881340354084886?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5035881340354084886/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=5035881340354084886' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5035881340354084886'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5035881340354084886'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/state-security-freeze-laws.html' title='State Security Freeze Laws'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-8815259739818239545</id><published>2007-07-20T17:07:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-07-20T17:11:09.312-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='general'/><title type='text'>IT Disaster Recovery Tool-kit</title><content type='html'>The &lt;a href="http://www.nascio.org/"&gt;National Association of State Chief Information Officers&lt;/a&gt; publishes this &lt;a href="http://www.nascio.org/publications/documents/NASCIO-DRToolKit.pdf"&gt;tool-kit&lt;/a&gt; which is designed to assist state CIOs and their staff in IT disaster recovery and business continuity planning. It is an updated and expanded version of business continuity and disaster preparedness checklists utilized for a brainstorming exercise at the “CIO-CLC Business Continuity/ Disaster Recovery Forum” at NASCIO’s 2006 Midyear Conference.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-8815259739818239545?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/8815259739818239545/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=8815259739818239545' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8815259739818239545'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/8815259739818239545'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/it-disaster-recovery-tool-kit.html' title='IT Disaster Recovery Tool-kit'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-3851250456357912717</id><published>2007-07-20T16:58:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-07-20T17:04:10.047-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Spyware'/><title type='text'>Spyware's Effect on Web Site Traffic Counts</title><content type='html'>Ben Edelman has a new article entitled "&lt;a href="http://www.benedelman.org/news/050707-1.html"&gt;How Spyware-Driven Forced Visits Inflate Web Site Traffic Counts&lt;/a&gt;." Also see this related &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/11/technology/11push.html?ei=5070&amp;en=6c7ec89caa091377&amp;amp;amp;ex=1184990400&amp;amp;pagewanted=print"&gt;New York Times article&lt;/a&gt; from Dec. 11 of 2006 entitled "In Web Traffic Tallies, Intruders Can Say You Visited Them."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-3851250456357912717?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/3851250456357912717/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=3851250456357912717' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3851250456357912717'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/3851250456357912717'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/spywares-effect-on-web-site-traffic.html' title='Spyware&apos;s Effect on Web Site Traffic Counts'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27060757.post-5126950652488765832</id><published>2007-07-20T16:39:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-07-20T16:43:56.244-04:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='identity theft'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='privacy'/><title type='text'>House Committee Passes Social Security Privacy Legislation</title><content type='html'>In a &lt;a href="http://waysandmeans.house.gov/news.asp?formmode=release&amp;id=539"&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt;, the House Ways and Means Committee stated "During the course of the 16 hearings conducted by the Subcommittee, numerous experts testified that the easy availability of Social Security numbers (SSNs) in the public and private sectors, combined with the number’s widespread use as an individual identifier, greatly facilitates the crime of identity theft. The bill would restrict the use of the SSN by government and business, to make it less accessible to identity thieves, while providing exceptions for legitimate and necessary uses of the number." Click &lt;a href="http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/110/07%2018%2007/3046amendment.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for a text of the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/pdf/110/07%2018%2007/3046amendment.pdf"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/27060757-5126950652488765832?l=technologylawblog.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/feeds/5126950652488765832/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=27060757&amp;postID=5126950652488765832' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5126950652488765832'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/27060757/posts/default/5126950652488765832'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://technologylawblog.blogspot.com/2007/07/house-committee-passes-social-security.html' title='House Committee Passes Social Security Privacy Legislation'/><author><name>Bill McComas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07670814671308040514</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
